Paleo2 wrote:Shorty wrote:Shouldn't have played Rodgers in a meaningless game. 6-9-1. Worst record since 2008.
If someone told you at the beginning of the season that Cleveland would have a better record than the Packers, with Rodgers starting every game, would you have thought them a bit nuts?
Yes, I would have. And that in spite of the fact that I thought Cleveland would be improved. But for the Packers to have a worse record than they had last year? No way.