* extrapolated to the "Stalkers." Penquin's just grasping at straws again...
gozer wrote: if this were a situation in which actual names were being used it would be considered defamatory; in any case it is a clear example of projection and trying to bluff one's way out of something by accusing others of the same thing
That's the irony of it all. In doing that, they've locked in on continuing in the same vein... in vain I think.
gozer wrote:-- i hope u have notified the moderators.
I think they're a smart group, and would be able to find out on their own if they wanted too. They might have to cut through some BS from inside influences. But it's there in spades once past that.
gozer wrote: someone who tries that hard to feign insouciance most assuredly has an unhealthy and unsafe surplus of frenzied negative energy . . .
That nails it.
gozer wrote:the sunshine bores the daylights out of lots of us, but someone takes a magnifying glass or a 150 cm frensel lens . . .
Meager food for souls forgot... : )