Breitbart dead at 43

If it's news, but not politics, then it goes here.
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 2402
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:26 pm

Re: Breitbart dead at 43

Postby mrak » Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:43 pm

Hey, I'll say something positive:

Two days ago, Andrew Breitbart was the worst kind of racist.

Now, he's the best kind of racist: the dead kind.

Kudos to him for finally, at the age of 43, making the kind of personal transformation that makes the world a better place, literally overnight.

Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 5173
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2004 11:31 am
Location: 53703

Re: Breitbart dead at 43

Postby Ducatista » Fri Mar 02, 2012 1:19 pm

Ned Flanders wrote:95% of the LSM's "reporters" are Democrats.

1. Not surprising. They're well informed, which renders them far less susceptible than the average voter to Republican fabrications.

2. A grown man reducing an already infantile Palinism to an even dumber initialism? A little comic relief in an otherwise dreary thread.

Henry Vilas
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 24703
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 8:57 pm
Location: Name sez it all

Re: Breitbart dead at 43

Postby Henry Vilas » Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:35 pm

Update (no, Breitbart is still dead): One of James O'Keefe's ACORN Videos Is Costing Him $100,000

O'Keefe's ACORN recordings ultimately doomed the organization; by March 2010, it announced that it was disbanding. O'Keefe fared better, becoming a hero to political conservatives after Andrew Breitbart picked up the story. As Wonkette notes, O'Keefe was reportedly paid $65,000 by Breitbart to write a blog post about the video series. Meaning that O'Keefe got all that fame and attention for the low price of $35,000.

Ned Flanders
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 14953
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2001 2:48 pm

Re: Breitbart dead at 43

Postby Ned Flanders » Fri Mar 08, 2013 1:24 pm

Dispatching that bunch of Marxist grifters was a bargain at any price.

Return to “Headlines”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests