Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Races for the Senate, U.S. House, etc. and other issues of national importance.
Huckleby
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 8719
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:12 pm
Location: parents' basement

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby Huckleby » Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:08 am

pjbogart wrote:Yikes! Nate Silver's election prediction has become a runaway train. Serious jumps today give Obama a 92.2% chance of winning


Odds have been revised down to 91.6%. Mittmentum has kicked in.

Detritus
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 2664
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:42 pm

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby Detritus » Tue Nov 06, 2012 10:21 am

Image

Bludgeon
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 1291
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:27 am

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby Bludgeon » Tue Nov 06, 2012 12:31 pm

Detritus wrote:Image

^^ That's awesome.

Detritus
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 2664
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:42 pm

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby Detritus » Tue Nov 06, 2012 11:57 pm

So...just bumping this thread because I can't resist.

pjbogart
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 6660
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:57 pm

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby pjbogart » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:00 am

Detritus wrote:So...just bumping this thread because I can't resist.


What the fuck are you talking about Detritus? Nate Silver's model is clearly flawed. He predicted that Obama would only win 303 electoral votes and he's likely to win 332. That's a pretty big difference.

What was Bludgeon's prediction?

Detritus
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 2664
Joined: Wed May 13, 2009 9:42 pm

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby Detritus » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:09 am

pjbogart wrote:
Detritus wrote:So...just bumping this thread because I can't resist.


What the fuck are you talking about Detritus? Nate Silver's model is clearly flawed. He predicted that Obama would only win 303 electoral votes and he's likely to win 332. That's a pretty big difference.

What was Bludgeon's prediction?

Actually, Silver's last 90% prediction was 313 electoral votes, but if you look at the electoral vote distribution graph, the models giving the highest probability are clustered at 330 votes. He was just being coy.

Good question about Bludge's prediction. I don't quite remember--Bludgeon, care to remind us?

kurt_w
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 6095
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 3:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby kurt_w » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:18 am

I think it's OK for people to choose not to offer a prediction ... but I do think Bludgeon might want to reconsider his unquestioning belief in flawed lines of reasoning about the polls.

People here tried repeatedly to explain to Bludgeon that he was deluding himself by credulously accepting every argument from the right-wing blogosphere that confirmed what he wanted to believe, while studiously avoiding any of the evidence that pointed in the other direction.

mrak
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 2396
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:26 pm

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby mrak » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:24 am

Bludgeon is, and always has been, a spectacular fool.

Search the Forum, and you'll find him insisting the recording "fake David Koch" prank call to Walker was "audioshopped" - even after Walker's office confirmed it was real.

It defies explanation that anyone pays him a moment's notice.

kurt_w
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 6095
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 3:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby kurt_w » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:39 am

You're probably right. I dunno, though, for some reason I never put Bludgeon in the same box as, say, Flanders. Flanders seems to know that he's just retailing propaganda. But Bludgeon somehow always seems to sincerely believe his own nonsense.

snoqueen
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 12960
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 11:42 pm

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby snoqueen » Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:45 am

I want to see the final tallies and find out exactly how close Nate Silver got to the popular vote margin.

pjbogart
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 6660
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:57 pm

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby pjbogart » Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:02 am

kurt_w wrote:You're probably right. I dunno, though, for some reason I never put Bludgeon in the same box as, say, Flanders. Flanders seems to know that he's just retailing propaganda. But Bludgeon somehow always seems to sincerely believe his own nonsense.


I'm not sure why but I always had the impression that Bludgeon was a Republican staffer. He's intelligent and eloquent and has all of the talking points at his fingertips. I guess that's a polite way of calling him a fluffer.

You guys seem to have a fondness for Flanders, I suspect largely due to his longevity. I admit that Flanders' dedication is admirable, but his repeated attacks on women and minorities make him a far more sinister figure than Bludgeon, in my mind. I don't recall Bludgeon ridiculing African American leaders, nor suggesting that Muslims are somehow inferior humans. He doesn't post unflattering pictures of women, essentially demeaning their value as humans by tying it to their physical beauty.

Jason's decision to praise Flanders' contributions perhaps says more about Jason than it does about Flanders.

kurt_w
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 6095
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 3:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby kurt_w » Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:05 am

pjbogart wrote:You guys seem to have a fondness for Flanders, I suspect largely due to his longevity.


Dunno who "you guys" is, but I'm as anti-Flanders as anyone around here. And you're right, the misogyny is a big part of it.

Galoot
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 1487
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2001 1:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby Galoot » Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:42 am

I'm too lazy to go back a page, so pardon me if this was posted already--but Nate Silver's "flawed model" got 50 out of 50 states correct.

Comments, Bludgeon?

Stebben84
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 6073
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby Stebben84 » Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:57 am

Bludgeon wrote:
To Kurt W: It's cool you like Nate Silver, I'm glad any time people get interested in electoral polls and prognosticating, but c'mon, fivethirtyeight.com is a wet dream on wheels.


I woke up in a puddle of joy.

Michael Patrick
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 4062
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 8:56 am
Location: Around here somewhere
Contact:

Re: Nate Silver's Flawed Model

Postby Michael Patrick » Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:43 am

I'm just glad that we had Dean Chambers to set the lame stream media straight.


Return to “National Politics & Government”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DCB and 7 guests