2011 Green Bay Packers

Badgers, Packers, Mallards. Paddling, running, golfing. And bikes!
fisticuffs
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 7980
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 2:49 pm
Location: Slightly outside of Madison
Contact:

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby fisticuffs » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:34 am

You think "we'd" do it? Who are you, B.J. Raji?

Just another small difference between extra chromosone set Packer backers and the sentient world.


Did somebody shit in your oatmeal this morning?

Ned Flanders
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 13797
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2001 2:48 pm
Contact:

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby Ned Flanders » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:45 am

fisticuffs wrote:Did somebody shit in your oatmeal this morning?


Najeh Davenport?

fisticuffs
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 7980
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 2:49 pm
Location: Slightly outside of Madison
Contact:

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby fisticuffs » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:47 am

Najeh Davenport?

Gesundheit

*Yes I had to google "gazoontite" to spell that correctly.

Ned Flanders
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 13797
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2001 2:48 pm
Contact:

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby Ned Flanders » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:05 am

fisticuffs wrote:
Najeh Davenport?

Gesundheit

*Yes I had to google "gazoontite" to spell that correctly.


That's OK. I had no idea that Daveport's nickname was "The Dump Truck" until I googled him.

scratch
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:00 pm
Location: Dane County
Contact:

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby scratch » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:47 pm

fisticuffs wrote:
You think "we'd" do it? Who are you, B.J. Raji?

Just another small difference between extra chromosone set Packer backers and the sentient world.


Did somebody shit in your oatmeal this morning?


Yes, Forrest Gregg and Charles Martin. And in mild defense of my posting, I did specify extra chromosone set Packer backers rather than all Packer fans. Unless you're suggesting that's a false distinction...

Stomach
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 1345
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 12:28 pm

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby Stomach » Fri Jan 13, 2012 3:28 pm

Giants look good right now and I expect them to come into Lambeau swinging.

I think the Packer running game gets going with Starks getting close to 100 yards (which is all he needs to get).

The Packer D comes out looking fresh, but still vulnerable to the run.

A late drive wins the game for the Packers. 31-29

gargantua
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 4972
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Madison

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby gargantua » Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:38 pm

scratch wrote:
gargantua wrote:I think we'd break it by beating da Bears


You think "we'd" do it? Who are you, B.J. Raji?

Just another small difference between extra chromosone set Packer backers and the sentient world.


You outed me. Thanks a lot.

gargantua
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 4972
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2002 1:30 pm
Location: Madison

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby gargantua » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:28 pm

Ouch. It really hurts that "we" lost. It can't be blamed on Rodgers. It's too bad that everyone on the offense except Donald Driver grew crab claws to replace their hands.

supaunknown
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 5578
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 3:22 pm

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby supaunknown » Sun Jan 15, 2012 10:57 pm

The team wasn't sharp. Rodgers fought hard, but he missed on a couple big plays. Each dropped pass grew more painful to watch. Charles Woodson being outraced by ... Brandon Jacobs? Argh.

This offseason should be interesting.

keelio
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 685
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 9:06 pm
Location: Cottage Grove
Contact:

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby keelio » Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:49 am

Outside of Driver, flashes of running game and run defense, the team and coaching staff left a lot in the locker room. It probably shouldn't have have been that close...overturned fumble in the first half was a gift, as was that 15 yard "blow to the head" penalty to keep the last scoring drive moving. Blame the caterer that filled the coffee urns with unleaded.

Stella_Guru
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 1216
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby Stella_Guru » Mon Jan 16, 2012 10:33 am

scratch wrote: And in mild defense of my posting, I did specify extra chromosone set Packer backers rather than all Packer fans.

You must be referring to Turners syndrome, which is found usually in small rural populations and is the result of inbreeding. Characteristics in women include narrow hips, broad shoulders, excess facial hair, a red face, a foul mouth, and obesity.

sabuye
Senior Member
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 12:08 am

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby sabuye » Mon Jan 16, 2012 11:57 am

Classy.

All I can say is, the Pack looked a lot like the Bears yesterday, with Caleb Hanie. Except that the Bears have a better secondary. And special teams.

Stomach
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 1345
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 12:28 pm

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby Stomach » Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:01 pm

I felt a lot like the Bears yesterday, sitting on my ass watching the playoffs. Just like them.

scratch
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 810
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 1:00 pm
Location: Dane County
Contact:

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby scratch » Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:17 pm

Stomach wrote:I felt a lot like the Bears yesterday, sitting on my ass watching the playoffs. Just like them.


Not losing to the Giants, thinking up hilarious posts to make to message boards, the similarities are nearly endless. The first call I heard this morning on a sportstalk show from Chicago was a PackerBacker eager to make the point that a Packers loss didn't make the Bears any better heading into next season. It's hard to argue with logic like that.

Stomach
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 1345
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2003 12:28 pm

Re: 2011 Green Bay Packers

Postby Stomach » Mon Jan 16, 2012 12:24 pm

scratch wrote:The first call I heard this morning on a sportstalk show from Chicago was a PackerBacker eager to make the point that a Packers loss didn't make the Bears any better heading into next season. It's hard to argue with logic like that.


Its true. Bears fans have more experience recently with schadenfreude than with winning and it wouldn't be fair to try to take that away from them.


Return to “Sports, Recreation & Biking”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Huckleby and 3 guests