Dave links to a website to give some evidence to support his claims about Ron Paul. The website is called The Democratic Hub and appears to be a general interest forum for Democratic-leaning folks. Dave's intent was to showcase the wealth of examples of Ron Paul's nuttiness - in fact, he calls his link
Problem is, this forum is pretty sparse - only 8 topics and less than 35 posts total. Several of the topics are started by people who support Ron Paul. Other sections of the website list "Ron Paul Controversies" (a single entry), "Ron Paul Opinion and Articles" (three articles), and "Latest Notable Statements by Ron Paul" (a single statement dated from 2007!).a catalogue of the goofy things this guy thinks and says...
Dave - you are a published columnist and you should take your job more seriously. If you want to make it seem like you've done a serious evaluation of the Ron Paul candidacy, then you should provide some better evidence to support your case. Did you look at any other site for your information on Ron Paul? If so, why did you choose to provide a relatively poor (and partisan) source of information for your readers? There are more in-depth Ron Paul conversations on this forum than on the page you've linked! In other spots on the web, there are thousands of posts and articles on Ron Paul, including both criticisms and support, that are readily available to anyone with elementary search engine savvy.
TL;DR - Mr. Dave continues to suck at National Politics.