Question for moderator re: spam

Comments on the paper, the website, the mobile site and all other Isthmus-generated products go here.
Dairylander
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:30 pm

Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Dairylander » Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:38 am

Does it complicate the deletion of spam if people post responses to it?

admin
Forum Addict
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Contact:

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby admin » Fri Jan 15, 2010 4:24 pm

Kinda. Some times the original post is deleted and the rest of the thread remains if only because there's entertaining stuff in there. I mean, the responding forons haven't broken any rules, right?

Sometimes we 86 the whole thread.

In the instance of the ugg thread, I just deleted the URLs out of the original because it was so funny and by the time I got to it, there were like 10 responses.

Dairylander
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Dairylander » Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:29 am

Suggestion:
How about you give an additional staff member the ability to delete spam?
Or maybe even one of the most trusted, prolific, veteran users could be entrusted to do some deletion?
It seems there are some times that the forum isn't monitored, and it gets pretty cluttered.

Dust Mite Rodeo
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 817
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:24 am
Location: Revival tent of the live-wire handlers

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Dust Mite Rodeo » Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:39 am

Would it help if, in order to create a user account, there was one of those confuse-a-bot gizmos where you have to read the code from a distorted picture?

In other words, are these spammy accounts being created by automated software?

Dust Mite Rodeo
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 817
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:24 am
Location: Revival tent of the live-wire handlers

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Dust Mite Rodeo » Sun Feb 14, 2010 11:51 am

Hmmm, FAVORS took 10 minutes to write his five posts, and created his profile on the day before. Doesn't seem bottish. But then a clever bot-master would program his bots to seem just like real people and take time writing posts. But wait, that's just what they're expecting us to think! No, THAT's just they're expecting us to think. Unless..

Dairylander
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Dairylander » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:01 pm

Dust Mite Rodeo wrote:Hmmm, FAVORS took 10 minutes to write his five posts,

The user name wasn't FAVORS, it was FAVOURS!
This is British spam terrorism!

Dust Mite Rodeo
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 817
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2005 10:24 am
Location: Revival tent of the live-wire handlers

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Dust Mite Rodeo » Sun Feb 14, 2010 12:33 pm

From the Bottish highlands!

Bwis53
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 6743
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2002 9:39 pm
Location: Bay Creek
Contact:

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Bwis53 » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:17 am

Do we know if this is the same spammer or different ones? Seems to be becoming an almost daily occurrence. Getting annoying.

Peanutbutter
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:54 am

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Peanutbutter » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:05 am

There's no reason for anyone to be a douche about this. There's a whole page full of contact email addresses if anyone has a question for Isthmus staff.

Dairylander
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 557
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:30 pm

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Dairylander » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:10 am

Peanutbutter wrote:There's no reason for anyone to be a douche about this. There's a whole page full of contact email addresses if anyone has a question for Isthmus staff.

We're just having a conversation.
Don't get your panties in a bundle.

jjoyce
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 12168
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2001 4:48 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby jjoyce » Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:16 pm

Near as we can tell, they're not bots. They're people, likely employed in some kind of tech sweat shop to enter spam in all sorts of places. Because we don't attempt to weed these people out at the registration phase, we don't know what's up until they start to post.

The good news is that they usually post in the early morning, so when I first log in I can usually take care of a lot of the spam. We also see relatively little of it.

The bad news is that it takes a decent chunk of time and I'd prefer to be doing just about anything else.

Uncle_Leaver
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 677
Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:58 pm
Contact:

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Uncle_Leaver » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:45 pm

jjoyce wrote:The bad news is that it takes a decent chunk of time and I'd prefer to be doing just about anything else.

I know a guy.

Just sayin'.

TheBookPolice
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 8533
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: The mystical Far East
Contact:

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby TheBookPolice » Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:02 pm

PB, if you can't see the difference between your passive-aggressive, whiny complaints about Madison Miscellany and the tone of the original question of this thread, then...well, tough. You're a lost cause at that point.

Ya big fuckin' crybaby.

Peanutbutter
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 11:54 am

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby Peanutbutter » Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:44 am

Ahh, a sarcastic, unserious response. I'd expect nothing less, BookPoPo.

TheBookPolice
Forum God/Goddess
Posts: 8533
Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:09 pm
Location: The mystical Far East
Contact:

Re: Question for moderator re: spam

Postby TheBookPolice » Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:40 am

Au contraire. It was a completely serious and unsarcastic response.


Return to “Comments on Isthmus & isthmus.com”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests